456
Comparison

RAG vs Fine-Tuning

When to retrieve, when to retrain.

1 min read

/ quick answer

Both techniques specialize an LLM for a domain, but they optimize for different constraints. RAG injects fresh knowledge at query time; fine-tuning bakes patterns into model weights. When to retrieve, when to retrain.

When to retrieve, when to retrain. Both techniques specialize an LLM for a domain, but they optimize for different constraints. RAG injects fresh knowledge at query time; fine-tuning bakes patterns into model weights. Recommendation: Start with RAG. Only fine-tune once you have evidence that prompt + retrieval cannot produce the behavior you need. This comparison node is part of the Onexial knowledge graph and links to related concepts, workflows and tools below.
Overview
Both techniques specialize an LLM for a domain, but they optimize for different constraints. RAG injects fresh knowledge at query time; fine-tuning bakes patterns into model weights.
Differences
DimensionOption AOption B
FreshnessUpdated by re-indexingStale until retrained
CostLow ongoingHigh per training run
Best forFacts, docs, citationsTone, format, style
Setup timeHoursDays
Use Cases
  • Customer support over a changing knowledge base → RAG
  • Consistent brand voice across all generations → Fine-tuning
Recommendation
Start with RAG. Only fine-tune once you have evidence that prompt + retrieval cannot produce the behavior you need.
Related Workflows
Related Tool Stacks
/ frequently asked

What is the difference in RAG vs Fine-Tuning?

Both techniques specialize an LLM for a domain, but they optimize for different constraints. RAG injects fresh knowledge at query time; fine-tuning bakes patterns into model weights.

What are the main points of comparison?

Freshness: Updated by re-indexing vs Stale until retrained · Cost: Low ongoing vs High per training run · Best for: Facts, docs, citations vs Tone, format, style · Setup time: Hours vs Days

Which one should I choose?

Start with RAG. Only fine-tune once you have evidence that prompt + retrieval cannot produce the behavior you need.